Scam

Webamooz.com’s Stand Against False DMCA Claims

Listen to this article briefly; the audio was generated automatically by AI.

In recent times, Webamooz.com has been at the forefront of confronting dubious DMCA claims. It is a crucial fight, as Digital Millennium Copyright Act (DMCA) claims have the power to influence online content, potentially stifling the voice of legitimate creators and platforms. Here, we delve deep into the specifics of four claims lodged against Webamooz.com and the subsequent actions taken by the platform.

all reports on Lumendatabase.org.

Report1: False DMCA Claim to Google

Sender: Ravioski Inc.
Recipient: Google LLC
Date: September 05, 2023
Issue: Claim of copyright infringement
Report

Ravioski Inc. approached Google with a DMCA complaint alleging that their original content, originally published on nycchronicles[.]com –Archive , had been fully copied, including texts and images, by webamooz.com. The alleged infringement was taken seriously by Google, leading to an immediate response.

However, upon further investigation, it was determined that the claim was baseless. The website nycchronicles[.]com appeared to lack any substantial history on both Google’s index and the Internet Archive’s Wayback Machine. This raised suspicions of the site being a counterfeit platform, set up solely to instigate false DMCA claims against genuine content providers. Armed with this evidence, a counter-notice was presented to Google, highlighting the discrepancies in the claimant’s arguments and underlining the authenticity of the content on Webamooz.

Outcome: After evaluating the evidence and the counter-notice, Google took corrective action and reinstated the URL webamooz.com/en/2022/05/09/farzin-fardin-fard-who-has-3fmusic-identity-is-unique-finance-fraudster-not-a-crypto-activist/.

Report2: False DMCA Claim to Sucuri and Pattern of Fraudulent Activities

Date: December 27, 2022
Sender: Tomas Ross
Recipient: Sucuri Abuse Team

In December, a DMCA copyright infringement complaint was directed to Sucuri from an entity presenting themselves as Tomas Ross. The grievance alleged that content from globalexpressmedianews.blogspot.com was unauthorizedly reproduced on iici.io, a secondary website of Webamooz.com.

A closer inspection yielded some suspicious findings. A post on globalexpressmedianews[.]blogspot[.]comArchive1 Archive2, presented a Farsi language video on an English-oriented platform without context, pointing towards possible deceitful motives.

Moreover, archive data showed no records for the claimed year 2011 for the blog, raising further questions about the authenticity of the claim.

In parallel, evidence surfaced from realbasics.com, where they documented an eerily similar situation. A bogus DMCA takedown notice had been received from an email address “legaltomasross[at]gmail.com” over content posted on Global News or Global Express News. Intriguingly, the DMCA notice contained discrepancies in dates, with the claimant’s content date and the alleged infringing site’s content date not aligning. Realbasics clearly pointed out the discrepancy, emphasizing the fabricated nature of the DMCA claims. They also noted that the scam seems to involve posting negative copies of original content on “Global Express News” with manipulated dates.

It is crucial to underline the severity of these findings. The incidents not only implicate Tomas Ross in multiple fraudulent activities but also highlight a pattern of cyber manipulation aimed at unfairly penalizing innocent websites.

Outcome: Armed with the counter evidence, Sucuri rightly chose not to take any action against the allegedly infringing website and continued their services uninterrupted.

Farzin Fardin Fard who has 3fmusic identity is unique finance fraudster, not a crypto activist!

Report3: DMCA Infringement Notice to Cloudflare and Webamooz’s Alleged Copyright Violation

Date: May 4, 2023

Sender: Will James (on behalf of Farzin Fardin Fard)
Recipient: Cloudflare

Cloudflare, a web performance and security company, received a DMCA copyright infringement complaint targeting the website Webamooz.com. The details of the complaint are as follows:

Details of the Complainant:

  • Name: Will James
  • Email Address: willjameslegal[at]gmail.com
  • Title: DMCA NOTICE
  • Company: DMCA NINJAS
  • Telephone: 0309030818
  • Address: DMCA NINJAS Office no.3, Shadman Town, Lahore, Pakistan, Punjab, Lahore, PK

The complainant identified themselves as representing Farzin Fardin Fard, who purportedly holds the copyright for the content in question.

Nature of the Complaint: The alleged infringing URL is: https://www.webamooz.com/en/wp-content/uploads/2022/05/334.png

The complainant demands the immediate removal of the infringing link from Cloudflare’s servers, asserting that the website posted copyrighted content without due authorization. This act is presented as a violation not only of the DMCA’s stipulations but also Cloudflare’s own copyright policies.

In response, Cloudflare informed the recipient of the forwarded complaint and recommended action with their hosting provider.

Counter-Action by Webamooz: Upon receiving the complaint, Webamooz promptly communicated with its hosting provider and presented evidence challenging the legitimacy of the claim. The key counter-points raised by Webamooz include:

  • There is no verifiable existence of a company named “DMCA NINJAS”.
  • The provided address for “DMCA NINJAS Office no.3, Shadman Town, Lahore, Pakistan, Punjab, Lahore, PK” is not associated with any genuine business location.
  • Based on the information, the claim appears to be fabricated with the intention of misrepresentation.

Outcome: As of this report, further action or response from Webamooz.com or its hosting provider remains undisclosed. The challenge raised by Webamooz regarding the authenticity of the claim is currently under consideration.

Report4: The Contradiction of Authenticity

Details of the Complainant:

  • Name: Jacob Stevens
  • Authorized DMCA Agent
  • Email Address: [email protected]
  • Alternate Corporate Email Address: [email protected]
  • Phone Number: +9203170900018
  • Address: Office #2, 3rd Floor Executive Attorney Building, Dastan Road, Lahore, Pakistan.

Nature of the Complaint: The complainant alleged unauthorized use of an image, specifically a YouTube profile picture, on Webamooz.com. The original copyrighted content was cited to be from a YouTube user with the handle ‘fardinfard’. The infringing URL was mentioned, pointing towards a specific PNG image hosted on Webamooz.com.

Counter-Action by Webamooz: Webamooz.com carried out a detailed investigation into the complaint. Key observations were:

  1. Mismatched Physical Address: The provided physical address, specifically “Office #2, 3rd Floor Executive Attorney Building, Dastan Road, Lahore, Pakistan,” seems dubious and does not align with the corporate identity associated with the jzlawfirm.com domain. It raises suspicion when combined with the fact that the primary communication is done via a Gmail address ([email protected]) instead of the corporate email.
  2. Content in Question: The alleged copyrighted image pertains to a YouTube profile picture from a channel named “Farzin Fardin Fard”. Upon inspection, this channel is relatively inactive, having posted content over a decade ago.
  3. Legitimacy of the Corporate Email Address: The email address [email protected] belongs to a genuine company named “Jado & Zatlenski, Counsellors at Law” based in Englewood, NJ. The company’s official website is jzlawfirm.com.

Given these inconsistencies and contradictions in the complainant’s assertions, Webamooz.com decided to retain the image and prepare a comprehensive rebuttal to refute the claim.

Outcome: With the evidence at hand and the inconsistencies in the complaint, Webamooz.com is poised to challenge the DMCA claim assertively. The platform remains vigilant and committed to its stance against baseless copyright infringement accusations.

Farzin Fardin Fard’s Attempt to Remodel His Image

In an interesting twist to this saga, as Webamooz faced an onslaught of false DMCA claims, Farzin Fardin Fard has been seemingly active in bolstering his public image. As showcased by the images, Farzin Fardin Fard has endeavored to present himself as a lover of Non-Fungible Tokens (NFTs) and an accomplished music engineer.

One can observe his assertive push into the media limelight. Farzin Fardin Fard’s website farzinfardinfard[.]info paints a grand picture of him against the mesmerizing backdrop of Dubai, labelling him as the “CEO & Owner of 3F Music in Dubai UAE.” The vivid imagery combined with the portrayal suggests a strategic attempt to position himself as an influential figure in the music and digital art scene.

Moreover, other websites such as farzin-fardin-fard[.]com emphasize his achievements and involvement in the music industry, portraying him as a magnate of music and technology. Here, he is described as a “distinguished sound engineer” and the powerhouse behind “3F Music,” a leading music recording studio in Dubai.

Additionally, Farzin has been featured in various media outlets. On openPR, he’s lauded as a “Sound Engineer, Music Producer, and Philanthropist” who’s unveiling “New Initiatives in Music and Technology.” Another article from FOX 40 speaks about how Farzin sets industry standards and presents him as an innovator in music and technology.

These guest posts and media engagements seem to be a calculated move. By promoting himself and being presented in such a positive light across various platforms, it appears as though there’s an effort to overshadow or bury the controversies surrounding the bogus DMCA claims. Such tactics can be viewed as an attempt to divert attention from the unsavory actions and instead, spotlight his purported achievements.

While it’s not uncommon for individuals and entities to engage in PR campaigns to enhance their image, the timing and the intensity of Farzin’s promotional spree, juxtaposed with the false DMCA claims, raises eyebrows. Is this a genuine endeavor to share his passion for music and NFTs, or is it a smokescreen to divert attention from the allegations and controversies? Only time will tell.

Conclusion:

In our rapidly evolving digital landscape, the preservation of content integrity is of utmost importance. The DMCA is designed as a safeguard for original creators and copyright holders, but it’s vital to ensure that this instrument is not manipulated for malicious intentions or undue censorship. Webamooz.com, as showcased through these in-depth reports, stands firmly on the principles of transparency, authenticity, and the righteous use of digital content. Our mission transcends beyond mere content sharing; it is to expose the true face of digital criminals and halt scammers from exploiting innocent individuals. We believe in the importance of dialogue and cooperation and urge genuine copyright holders to engage in meaningful communication. By doing so, we can create an online space that not only respects and rewards creators but also ensures the safety and rights of all its users. The challenges in the digital realm are numerous, but with vigilance and a commitment to truth, we can ensure that scammers find no shadows to hide in, and justice always prevails.

Short link : webamooz.com/en/?p=24674

Related Articles

4 Comments

  1. Why, even though the names of 8 fraudsters of Unique Finance Company have been announced to Interpol (from iran police) and they are in dubai and turkye according to the following names,
    1_ Farzin Fardin Fard
    2_ Nima Tabari Fard,
    3_ Hossein Salari Moghadam,
    4_ seyed mojtaba Gooran Jalalee
    5- Vahid Ebrahimi
    6_ Alireza Mahdiun,
    7_ Navid Divan (Mohammed Pourrangi)
    8_ Amir Mohammad Shabani
    but these people have not been added to Interpol’s Red Notice list yet?

  2. Farzin Fardin Fard definitely defrauded vast majority of investors in Unique Finance company project 😏

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Back to top button